8 Oct 25
Changes to pay equity law could put the current governing coalition at risk of losing power.
A new survey, conducted by Horizon as part of its public interest research programme, indicates that, depending on the prominence of the pay equity changes at the time, there is a risk of the coalition parties losing a nett 5.6% (equivalent to 159,860) of their collective 2023 votes. The impact would be sufficient for a hung parliament outcome.
There is also a further risk: a nett 50,750 voters for parties not currently in parliament would be more likely to change their vote in opposition to the pay equity changes.
The effect, if all these votes transferred to parliamentary opposition parties and combined with the potential risk noted above, would be to give the current parliamentary opposition parties 61 seats at the 2026 election, two more than the current coalition parties.
69% understand the pay equity law changes either very well (18%) or somewhat well (51%). The greater the understanding of the bill, the greater the opposition to it.
42% of respondents overall opposed the pay equity law changes. Highest support comes from ACT (59%) and National (58%) voters. Despite the strongest opposition coming from Green (75%) and Labour (67%) voters, the opposition to this Bill includes 28% of those who voted for one of the current Government coalition parties in 2023.
The people who are more likely to strongly oppose the changes are:
• Professional/Government officials – 41% strongly oppose
• Teacher/ Nurse/ Police or other trained service worker – 43% strongly oppose
• Working in Government Administration or Defence – 45%.
Overall, respondents thought that New Zealanders should have had a say on the pay equity law changes and that the changes will make it harder for women to seek fair pay. Respondents were asked to disagree or agree with a series of statements about the bill:
All respondents were asked whether the Government’s pay equity changes would be likely to change, or not change, their party vote at the next general election.
The following chart shows the overall results for this question, including those who did not vote in the 2023 general election and those who voted for minor parties who did not achieve seats in parliament.
8% overall were likely to change their vote in support of the Bill, while 25% said they were likely to change their party vote in opposition to the Bill.
However, the potential effect on voting patterns at the next general election is best viewed by analysis of the collective effects on the parties currently forming the coalition government and those currently forming the parliamentary opposition.
Analysis indicates that of the voters in the 2023 general election[1]:
Overall, this suggests that, depending on the prominence of this issue at the time, the pay equity changes constitute a risk to the Government coalition parties at the next general election.
Respondents who had voted in the 2023 general election for the parties making up the current Government coalition and said they were likely to change their vote in opposition to the Bill tended to be:
Respondents who had voted in the 2023 general election for the parties making up the current parliamentary opposition and who said they were likely to change their vote in support of the Bill tended to be:
Note that a majority (73%) of those who voted for the current coalition government parties at the 2023 general election are unlikely to change their vote because of the bill. 12% were unsure.
Before answering questions about the Pay Equity Amendment Bill respondents were shown the following information.
Pay equity is about ensuring that everyone is paid the same for work of equal value.
This means that jobs requiring similar skills, effort, responsibility and working conditions should be paid comparably. Even if the roles are different.
In May 2025, the Government passed the Pay Equity Amendment Bill.
This Bill was passed under urgency, without any advance notice or select committee hearings.
It cancelled 33 active pay-equity claims and raised the threshold for making future claims. Those who have already settled claims cannot make another one for 10 years.
The Government has said that this will result in an estimated savings of $12 billion.
Critics argue it undermines the rights of women in female-dominated professions.
Supporters say it corrects a flawed system and will save taxpayers billions.
Stuff news coverage of the survey is here.
This survey was commissioned by Horizon Research as part of its public interest research programme.
Research method
An online survey of adults living in New Zealand aged 18 and older.
Sample sources
Members of two nationwide Horizon Research panels and a third-party panel (used for source diversity).
Fieldwork dates
28th August to 4th September 2025
Sample size
1,026 adults.
Weighting
The total sample is weighted on age, gender, ethnicity, region and party vote at the 2023 general election to reflect the New Zealand adult population.
Maximum predicted margin of error
±3.1% at the 95% confidence level.
Population estimates in the report
These are based on the Stats NZ Census 2023 population of 3,865,235 people aged 18 or more. All population numbers are to the nearest thousand.
Party vote impact analysis
Demographic data tables and additional in-depth analysis are available to purchase from Horizon Research.
Email: manager@horizonresearch.co.nz
[1] https://elections.nz/media-and-news/2023/official-results-for-the-2023-general-election/
[2] https://elections.nz/stats-and-research/mmp-seat-allocation-calculator/
HorizonPoll Online Survey system
and website developed by BEWEB
Copyright © 2010. HorizonPoll incorporating ShapeNZ - Listening to New Zealand